State legislation for single-use plastics in Mexico: Which sectors are included?
Main Article Content
Abstract
In Mexico, there is a growing trend to reform the state waste management legislation to curb the dispersion of single-use plastics (P1U) and encourage waste reduction through co-responsibility actions. Currently, 29 of Mexico’s 32 states establish the participation of society’s sectors to motivate plastics governance in their laws. However, a national study is still needed to provide information on how responsibility is distributed within the legislation. Therefore, through network analysis, this study aimed to evaluate the diversity of actors and their inclusion as sectors within the legislation regulating P1U in Mexico. According to the research findings, Mexican state legislation aimed at reducing the spread of P1U relies primarily on economic measures targeting the distribution and commercialization sectors, accounting for 90% of the overall strategy.; however, the productive and academic sectors are underrepresented. This study presents a methodological proposal to provide a concise and schematic visualization of the diverse actors and sectors involved in the complex responsibility landscape for P1U reduction. The network analysis tool could be used to facilitate the task of decision-makers or for research that considers quantitative legislative review.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Once an article is accepted for publication, the author(s) agree that, from that date on, the owner of the copyright of their work(s) is Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental. Reproduction of the published articles (or sections thereof) for non-commercial purposes is permitted, as long as the source is provided and acknowledged. Authors are free to upload their published manuscripts at any non-commercial open access repository. Accepted, but not published articles (preprints), are not allowed to be distributed by any means. The violation of this rule may end in the withdrawal of the accepted article.
PLUMX metrics
References
REFERENCIAS
Aguilar Villanueva, L. (2016). Democracia, gobernabilidad y gobernanza. Conferencias magistrales temas de democracia. Instituto Nacional Electoral. Disponible en: CM25_baja.pdf (ine.mx)
Aguilar Villanueva, L. (2010). El futuro de la gestión pública y la gobernanza después de la crisis. Frontera Norte, Vol. 22, Núm. 43, enero-junio de 2010. Disponible en: v22n43a8.pdf (scielo.org.mx)
Benson,N., Bassey, D. E. & Palanisami, T. (2021) COVID pollution: impact of COVID-19 pandemic on global plastic waste footprint. Heliyon 7 (2021) e06343 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06343
Canto Chac, M. (2008). Gobernanza y participación ciudadana en las políticas públicas frente al reto del desarrollo. Política y cultura versión impresa ISSN 0188-7742 Polít. cult. no.30 México ene. 2008
Cura Rodrigo R. & Vezub Julio E. (2014). Análisis de grafos bipartitos en función de múltiples proyecciones: aplicación a un caso de estudio histórico. XX Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación (Buenos Aires, 2014), Red de Universidades con Carreras de Informática (RedUNCI), Objeto de conferencia. Disponible en: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/42292
Elhacham1, E. Ben-Uri1, L. Grozovski1, J. M. Bar-On1, Y& Milo, R (2020). Global human-made mass exceeds all living Biomass. Nature, Vol 588, 17 December 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5
Fuger, S.,Köhl, A., Ströhle, T., Lang, M., Füller, J., Hutter, K. (2021). Fighting the wicked problem of plastic pollution and its consequences for developing regions with expert and crowd solutions. Conference paper. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences | 2021.
Comunicado de prensa Jefatura de gobierno, 2020. Se suspenden actividades económicas no esenciales en la Ciudad de México y Estado de México hasta el 10 de enero de 2021 (cdmx.gob.mx)
Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv. 2017;3:25–29. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700782. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Guibrunet, L. (2019). What is ‘‘informal” in informal waste management? Insights from the case of waste collection in the Tepito neighbourhood, Mexico City. Waste management 86 2019. Pp. 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.021
Gutiérrez-Galicia, F.; Coria-Páez, A.L.; Tejeida-Padilla, R.; Galicia-Haro, E.F. (2021). A System for the Inclusion of the Informal Recycling Sector (IRS) in Mexico City’s Solid Waste Management. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12490. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su132212490
Hanneman, R. A. (2001). Introducción a los métodos de análisis de redes sociales. Departamento de Sociología de la Universidad de California, Riverside, EE.UU. Capítulo v. Propiedades básicas de las redes y de los actores. Pp. 3-26
Harrison, K., & Antweiler, W. (2003). Incentives for pollution abatement: Regulation, regulatory threats, and non‐governmental pressures. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(3), 361-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.10137
Información Científica y Tecnológica para el Congreso de la Unión (INCyTU) (2019). Plásticos en los océanos.. Autor: Luis Marco García Marín, Responsable: Dr. Miguel Enrique Rentería Rodríguez. NOTA-INCyTU establecida y operada por el Foro Consultivo, Científico y Tecnológico.| NÚMERO 034 | NOVIEMBRE 2019. (pp. 1-6)
Jiménez Martínez, N. M. (2016). Gestión integral de los residuos sólidos urbanos y producción de desigualdades: Construcción de la geografía de los desechos en México. Premio Nacional de Investigación Social y de Opinión Pública 2016 Primera edición: 30 de diciembre de 2016 Centro de Estudios Sociales y de Opinión Pública Cámara de Diputados / LXIII LegislaturaPremio Nacional de Investigación 2016.indd (medicionmia.org.mx)
Jordano, P., Vázquez, D. & Boscompte, J. (2009) Capítulo 1 Redes complejas de interacciones mutualistas planta-animal. En: Ecología y evolución de interacciones planta-animal. Mede R. , A. Aizen M. & Zamora R: (editores) -- 1a ed. –- Santiago de Chile : Universitaria, 2009. 399 p.: 75 il. (algs. col.) ; 21,5 x 27 cm. -– (Bicentenario Charles Darwin) Incluye glosario e índice de términos. Bibliografía: p.23-25
Kettunen, M., Gionfra, S. and Monteville, M. (2019) EU circular economy and trade: Improving policy coherence for sustainable development, IEEP Brussels / London Disponible en: EU trade, CE and sustainable development (IEEP 2019) FINAL.pdf
Kauffmann, M. (2011). Efficiently Using GPU Memory in Faber, R. CUDA Application Design and Development. P. 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-388426-8.00006-9. Centrality Metric - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Kooiman, J. (2005). Gobernar en Gobernanza en Cerrillo, Agustin coord La gobernanza hoy: 10 textos de referencia., 1.ª ed.Madrid: Instituto Nacional, de Administración Pública, 2005. 262 p.ISBN: 84-7351-239-1 - NIPO: 329-05-020-X
Landemore, H. (2012). 2012b. “Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and Why It Matters.” Journal of Public Deliberation. Disponible en (3) (PDF) Democratic Reason: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few and Why it Matters (researchgate.net)
Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 31, 297-325.
Lozarez, C. La teoría de las redes sociales. revista Papers 48. Vol. 48 (1996): La construcción de tipologías: ejemplos de aplicación https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v48n0.1814
Martínez, N. & Espejel I. (2015). La investigación de la gobernanza en México y su aplicación ambiental. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio vol xv, núm 47, 2015, 153-183. versión en línea ISSN 2448-6183versión impresa ISSN 1405-8421
Pacini, H., Shi, G., Sanches-Pereira, A., & Filho, A. C. da S. (2021). Network analysis of international trade in plastic scrap. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.027
Porras, F. (2021). Redes, gobernanza y metagobernanza. En Morales-Fajardo M. E.& Cadena-Inostroza, C.¿Redes o gobernanza? Experiencias de colaboración entre actores.Ed. UNAM, CRIM. pp342
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2018). Single-use plastic: A roadmap for sustainability. In United Nation Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Environmental Technology Centre (IETC).
PNUMA, Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente. (2018). EL ESTADO DE LOS PLÁSTICOS. Perspectiva del día mundial del medio ambiente 2018. PNUMA. Disponible en: WED 2018_KeyReport_ES.pdf (unep.org)
Silva, A. L. P., Prata, J. C., Walker, T. R., Duarte, A. C., Ouyang, W., Barcelò, D., & Rocha-Santos, T. (2021). Increased plastic pollution due to COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and recommendations. Chemical Engineering Journal, 405, 126683.
Simon, N. & Schulte, M L (2017): Strengthening Plastic Governance: Towards a New Global Convention. Berlin: adelphi.Disponible en: Simon-Schulte 2017 - Strengthening Plastic Governance_final.pdf (adelphi.de)
Trejo Nieto, A. B., Niño Amezquita J.L. & Vázquez Ma. L.. (2018). Governance of metropolitan areas for delivery of public services in Latin America: the cases of Bogota, Lima and Mexico City. Region The journal of ERSA. Volume 5, Number 3, 2018, 49-73 . DOI: 10.18335/region.v5i3.224
US National Institute of General Medical Sciences [NIGMS], & National Resource for Network Biology [NRNB]. (2020). Cytoscape Consortium. https://cytoscape.org/download.htm
United Nations Environment Programme, U. (2018). Single-use plastic: A roadmap for sustainability. In United Nation Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Environmental Technology Centre (IETC).
Vázquez Morillas, Alethia, Velasco Pérez, Maribel; Espinosa Valdemar, Rosa Ma.Morales Contreras Marcos,Hernández Islas, Saúl, Ordaz Guillén, María Yolanda Leonor, Almeida Filgueira, Hamilcar José. (2016). Generación, Legislación y Valorización de Residuos Plásticos en Iberoamérica. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambie. 32 (Especial Residuos Sólidos) 63-76, 2016 DOI: 10.20937/RICA.2016.32.05.05
Velázquez Álvarez O. A. & Aguilar Gallegos N. (2005). Manual introductorio al análisis de redes sociales. Medidas de centralidad. Ejemplos prácticos con UCINET 6.85 y Netdraw 1.48.
Vimal, K. E. K., Mathiyazhagan, K., Agarwal, V., Luthra, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2020). Analysis of barriers that impede the elimination of single-use plastic in developing economy context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122629
Wagner, Martin (2022). Solutions to Plastic Pollution: A Conceptual Framework to Tackle a Wicked Problem in Banl Michel, edit. Microplastic in the Environment: Pattern and Process. Springer International Publishing DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78627-4
Zilla, C. (2022) Defining democratic inclusion from the perspective of democracy and citizenship theory, Democratization, DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2022.2090929
Shammah, C & Saidón, M. (2018). Recuperadores urbanos: miradas sobre su inclusión social en la gestión integral de residuos en la Región Metropolitana de Buenos Aires. En Recicloscopio V / Adriana Silva Alves ... [et al.] ; compilado por Pablo Javier Schamber ; Francisco M. Suárez. - 1a ed. - Los Polvorines : Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Buenos Aires. Recicloscopio_V_PRESS20200427-126122-wl5t8f-with-cover-page-v2.pdf (d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net)