Perception of agronomy students on agrochemical pollution

Main Article Content

Perla Carrillo Quiroga

Abstract

This research involves an interdisciplinary study on the perception of agrochemical pollution in students from six Mexican universities enrolled in agronomic science engineering programs and related areas, such as agroecology, agroforestry engineering, and innovation for sustainable agriculture. The research method is mixed with an exploratory approach; data were collected in an online questionnaire, measuring attitudes, values, and actions related to the use of agrochemicals, as well as a self-assessment knowledge test about pesticides, fertilizers, and their effects on the environment and human health. The theoretical approach emerges from environmental psychology, agroecology, and environmental education. A theoretical model is proposed to explore the formation of mental models and beliefs about sustainable agricultural systems, and recommendations are made for optimizing agronomic science engineering programs with a focus on sustainability. The results show a high level of environmental awareness in students, a low perception of social norms for environmental conservation, and the perception of agrochemicals as essential for production, representing a cognitive barrier to implementing sustainable agricultural strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Sharing on:

PLUMX metrics

References

Amudson, R., A.A. Berche, J.W. Hopmans et al. Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science 348(6235): 1261071-1 - 1261071-6. 2015.

Amundson, R. et al. (2015). Soil and human security in the 21st century, Science, 348 (6235), 1261071-1261071. DOI:10.1126/science.1261071

Aguilar Ibarra, A. y Pérez Espejo, R. (2008) La Contaminación Agrícola del Agua en México: Retos y Perspectivas, Problemas del Desarrollo, Revista Latinoamericana de Economía, Vol. 39, núm. 153, abril-junio p. 205- 215.

Ahnstrom, J., Hockert, J., Bergea, H., Francis, Ch., Skelton, P. & Hallgren, L. (2009) Farmers and nature conservation: What is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 24 (1) , pp. 38-47

Asghar U, Malik MF, Javed A (2016) Pesticide Exposure and HumanHealth: A Review. J Ecosys Ecograph S5: 005. doi: 10.4172/2157-7625.S5-005

Botías, C., David, A., Hill, E. M., Goulson, D. (2017) Quantifying exposure of wild bumblebees to mixtures of agrochemicals in agricultural and urban landscapes, Environmental Pollution http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.001

Bakker, L., Sok, J.,Van der Werf, W. & Bianchi, F. (2021). Kicking the Habit: What Makes and Breaks Farmers' Intentions to Reduce Pesticide Use?. Ecological Economics. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106868.

Babu, S.C., Nivas, B.T. & Rajasekaran, B. Groundwater pollution from agrochemicals — A dynamic model of externalities and policy options. Water Resour Manage 6, 1–13 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872183

Chèze, B., David, M., Martinet, V. (2020) Understanding farmers’ reluctance to reduce pesticide use: A choice experiment. Ecological Economics, Elsevier, 2020, 167, pp.106349. ff10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.06.004ff. ffhal-02317175f

Carrillo Quiroga, P., Gómez Quinto, C., y Chacón Hernández, J. C. (2022). El impacto afectivo, cognitivo y conductual de los videos medioambientales: noticias, documental y TED Talk. Acta Universitaria 32, e3300. doi. http://doi.org/10.15174.au.2022.3300

Jayaraj, R., Megha, P. & Sreedev, P. (2016). Organochlorine pesticides, their toxic effects on living organisms and their fate in the environment. Interdisciplinary toxicology, 9(3-4), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1515/intox-2016-0012

Gliessman, S. R., Rosemeyer, M. (2010) The Conversion to Sustainable Agriculture, Principles, Processes and Practices, CRC PRess, Boca Ratón.

Gliessman (2020) Can we feed ourselves as climate changes? Another warning, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 44:3, 283-283, DOI: 10.1080/21683565.2020.1687692

Golan, G. & Day, A. (2008) The First-Person Effect and Its Behavioral Consequences: A New Trend in the Twenty-Five Year History of Third-Person Effect Research, Mass Communication and Society, 11:4, 539-556, DOI: 10.1080/15205430802368621

Horak, I., Horn, S., Pieters, R., (2020) Agrochemicals in freshwater systems and their potential as endocrine disrupting chemicals: A South African context, Environmental Pollution, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115718.

Jain, M., Mudhoo, A., Lakshmi Ramasamy, D., Najafi, M., Usman, M., Zhu, R., Shobana, S., Kumar Garg, V. y Sillanpää (2020) Adsorption, degradation, and mineralization of emerging pollutants (pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals) by nanostructures: a comprehensive review, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, July. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09635-x

Kajiwara N, Kannan K, Muraoka M, Watanabe M, Takahashi S, Gulland F, Ol- sen H, Blankenship AL, Jones PD, Tanabe S, Giesy JP. (2001). Organochlorine Pesticides, Polychlorinated Biphenyls, and Butyltin Compounds in Blub- ber and Livers of Stranded California Sea Lions, Elephant Seals, and Harbor Seals from Coastal California. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 41(1) : 90–99.

Kaldeen, M. (2019) Factors Influencing the Purchase of Agro-chemicals: From the Perspective of Sri Lankan Farmers, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, vol. 8, Issue 2S11.

Khanna, R. y Gupta, S. (2018). Agrochemicals as a potential cause of ground water pollution: A review. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6 (3): 985-990.

Klöckner, C. (2015) The Psychology of Pro-Environmental Communication, Beyond Standand Information Strategies. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan.

Lin, S. (2013). Perceived Impact of a Documentary Film: An Investigation of the First-Person Effect and Its Implications for Environmental Issues, Science Communication. 35(6), 708–733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1075547013478204

Mandal, A., Sarkar, B., Mandal, S., Vithanage, M., Patra, A. Y Manna, M. (2020) Chapter 7. Impact of agrochemicals on soil health, en Prasad, M.N.V. (ed.) Agrochemicals Detection, Treatment and Remediation, Pesticides and Chemical Fertilizers. Elsevier, p. 161-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-103017-2.00007-6

Marchand, P. (2019) Synthetic agrochemicals; a necessary clarification about their use exposure and impact in crop protection, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 26, 1.

Méndez, E., Bacon, Ch., Cohen, r., Gliessman, S. (2016) Agroecology, A Transdisciplinary, Participatory and Action-oriented Approach, Taylor & Francis Group

Phillips, W. (1983) The Third-Person Effect in Communication, Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 47, Issue 1, SPRING 1983, Pages 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1086/268763

Pamminger, T., Botías, C., Goulson, D. y Hughes, W. (2017) A mechanistic framework to explain the immunosuppressive effects of neurotoxic pesticides on bees, Functional Ecology, 32:1921-1930.

Phang W, Funk S, Steinwand B, Leighton T. (1996). The Second Revised HED Chapter of the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document (RED) for Di- cofol USEPA.

Peterson ME, Talcot PA. (2006). Small Animal Toxicology, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: St. Louis, 2006; pp 526–527, 941–949.

Samal, S., Mishra, C. Y Sahoo, S. (2018) Setal-epidermal, muscular and enzymatic anomalies induced by certain agrochemicals in the earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg), Environmental Science and Pollution Research, doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04204-3

Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. (2009). Report of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee on the work of its fth meeting. UNEP/POPS /POPRC.5 /10/ Add.2.

Uhl, P. y Brühl, C. (2019) The Impact of Pesticides on Flower-Visiting Insects: A Review with Regard to European Risk Assessment, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 38, núm. 11: pp. 2355–2370. DOI: 10.1002/etc.4572

USEPA. (1975). DDT- A review of scienti c and economic aspects of the deci- sion to ban its use as a pesticide ; EPA 540/1- 75-022; U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, O ce of Pesticide Programs, U. S. Government Printing O ce: Washington, DC.

USEPA. (2000). Environmental Risk Assessment for Diazinon ; U.S. Environ- mental Protection Agency, O ce of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Sub- stances, O ce of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Government Printing O ce: Washington, DC.

USEPA. (2003). Health E ects Support Document for Aldrin/Dieldrin, U.S. En- vironmental Protection Agency, O ce of Water (4304T), Health and Eco- logical Criteria Division, Washington, DC 20460

Zhang, W. (2018) Global pesticide use: Profile, trend, cost / benefit and more, Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 8 (1): 1-27.